1996 Audi A3 vs. 1979 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 1996 Audi A3 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,781 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Audi A3 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Audi A3 weights approximately 360 kg more than 1979 Mazda Cosmo.
Because 1996 Audi A3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1979 Mazda Cosmo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Audi A3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Audi A3 | 1979 Mazda Cosmo | |
Make | Audi | Mazda |
Model | A3 | Cosmo |
Year Released | 1996 | 1979 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1781 cc | 1768 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 93 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 88 mm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1450 kg | 1090 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2520 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 65 L |