1996 Audi A3 vs. 1980 Volvo 260
To start off, 1996 Audi A3 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Volvo 260. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Volvo 260 would be higher. At 2,383 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Volvo 260 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Audi A3 (100 HP) has 19 more horse power than 1980 Volvo 260. (81 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Audi A3 should accelerate faster than 1980 Volvo 260. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Volvo 260 weights approximately 316 kg more than 1996 Audi A3.
Because 1980 Volvo 260 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Volvo 260. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Audi A3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1980 Volvo 260 (140 Nm) has 4 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Audi A3. (136 Nm). This means 1980 Volvo 260 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Audi A3.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Audi A3 | 1980 Volvo 260 | |
Make | Audi | Volvo |
Model | A3 | 260 |
Year Released | 1996 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1595 cc | 2383 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 81 HP |
Torque | 136 Nm | 140 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.3:1 | 23.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1134 kg | 1450 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 4890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2660 mm |