1996 Audi A3 vs. 1981 Daihatsu Taft
To start off, 1996 Audi A3 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Daihatsu Taft. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Daihatsu Taft would be higher. At 1,595 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Audi A3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Audi A3 (100 HP) has 56 more horse power than 1981 Daihatsu Taft. (44 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Audi A3 should accelerate faster than 1981 Daihatsu Taft. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Audi A3 weights approximately 114 kg more than 1981 Daihatsu Taft. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1981 Daihatsu Taft is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Audi A3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Daihatsu Taft will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Audi A3 (136 Nm) has 72 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Daihatsu Taft. (64 Nm). This means 1996 Audi A3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Daihatsu Taft.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Audi A3 | 1981 Daihatsu Taft | |
Make | Audi | Daihatsu |
Model | A3 | Taft |
Year Released | 1996 | 1981 |
Engine Size | 1595 cc | 958 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 44 HP |
Torque | 136 Nm | 64 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1134 kg | 1020 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 3370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1470 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2030 mm |