1996 Audi A3 vs. 1982 Zastava 102
To start off, 1996 Audi A3 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 1,781 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Audi A3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Audi A3 (123 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 74 more horse power than 1982 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Audi A3 should accelerate faster than 1982 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Audi A3 weights approximately 370 kg more than 1982 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1996 Audi A3 (173 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 78 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1996 Audi A3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Audi A3 | 1982 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | Audi | Zastava |
| Model | A3 | 102 |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1982 |
| Engine Size | 1781 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 49 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 173 Nm | 95 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4100 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1140 kg | 770 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2160 mm |
