1996 Audi A3 vs. 1982 Zastava 1500

To start off, 1996 Audi A3 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Zastava 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Zastava 1500 would be higher. At 1,595 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Audi A3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Audi A3 (100 HP) has 26 more horse power than 1982 Zastava 1500. (74 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Audi A3 should accelerate faster than 1982 Zastava 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Audi A3 weights approximately 174 kg more than 1982 Zastava 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1982 Zastava 1500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Zastava 1500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Audi A3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Audi A3 (136 Nm) has 23 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Zastava 1500. (113 Nm). This means 1996 Audi A3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Zastava 1500.

Compare all specifications: