1996 Audi A3 vs. 1983 Fiat Ritmo
To start off, 1996 Audi A3 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Fiat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Fiat Ritmo would be higher. At 1,714 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Fiat Ritmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Audi A3 (100 HP) has 43 more horse power than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. (57 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Audi A3 should accelerate faster than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Audi A3 weights approximately 214 kg more than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Audi A3 (136 Nm) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. (105 Nm). This means 1996 Audi A3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Fiat Ritmo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Audi A3 | 1983 Fiat Ritmo | |
| Make | Audi | Fiat |
| Model | A3 | Ritmo |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1595 cc | 1714 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 57 HP |
| Torque | 136 Nm | 105 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 82.6 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 77.5 mm | 79.2 mm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1134 kg | 920 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 4020 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2460 mm |
