1996 Audi A3 vs. 1988 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 1996 Audi A3 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 2,835 cc (6 cylinders), 1988 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1988 Oldsmobile Cutlass (124 HP) has 24 more horse power than 1996 Audi A3. (100 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1988 Oldsmobile Cutlass should accelerate faster than 1996 Audi A3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1988 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 306 kg more than 1996 Audi A3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1988 Oldsmobile Cutlass (217 Nm) has 81 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Audi A3. (136 Nm). This means 1988 Oldsmobile Cutlass will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Audi A3.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Audi A3 | 1988 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Audi | Oldsmobile |
Model | A3 | Cutlass |
Year Released | 1996 | 1988 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1595 cc | 2835 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 124 HP |
Torque | 136 Nm | 217 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1134 kg | 1440 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 4930 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2740 mm |