1996 Audi A3 vs. 1992 Holden Apollo
To start off, 1996 Audi A3 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Holden Apollo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Holden Apollo would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Holden Apollo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Holden Apollo (118 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 1996 Audi A3. (101 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Holden Apollo should accelerate faster than 1996 Audi A3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Holden Apollo weights approximately 59 kg more than 1996 Audi A3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Holden Apollo (172 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 28 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Audi A3. (144 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 1992 Holden Apollo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Audi A3.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Audi A3 | 1992 Holden Apollo | |
Make | Audi | Holden |
Model | A3 | Apollo |
Year Released | 1996 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1595 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 101 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 144 Nm | 172 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1146 kg | 1205 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2610 mm |