1996 Audi A3 vs. 2000 Mazda 121
To start off, 2000 Mazda 121 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Audi A3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Audi A3 would be higher. At 1,781 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Audi A3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Audi A3 (123 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 64 more horse power than 2000 Mazda 121. (59 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Audi A3 should accelerate faster than 2000 Mazda 121. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Audi A3 weights approximately 210 kg more than 2000 Mazda 121. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Audi A3 (173 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 68 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Mazda 121. (105 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1996 Audi A3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Mazda 121.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Audi A3 | 2000 Mazda 121 | |
Make | Audi | Mazda |
Model | A3 | 121 |
Year Released | 1996 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1781 cc | 1298 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 173 Nm | 105 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4100 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1140 kg | 930 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 3830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2460 mm |