1996 Audi A3 vs. 2000 Oldsmobile SS
To start off, 2000 Oldsmobile SS is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Audi A3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Audi A3 would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Oldsmobile SS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Oldsmobile SS (202 HP) has 102 more horse power than 1996 Audi A3. (100 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Oldsmobile SS should accelerate faster than 1996 Audi A3.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Oldsmobile SS (318 Nm) has 182 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Audi A3. (136 Nm). This means 2000 Oldsmobile SS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Audi A3. 2000 Oldsmobile SS has automatic transmission and 1996 Audi A3 has manual transmission. 1996 Audi A3 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Oldsmobile SS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Audi A3 | 2000 Oldsmobile SS | |
Make | Audi | Oldsmobile |
Model | A3 | SS |
Year Released | 1996 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1595 cc | 3791 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 202 HP |
Torque | 136 Nm | 318 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 5130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1900 mm |