1996 Audi A3 vs. 2001 Daewoo Rezzo
To start off, 2001 Daewoo Rezzo is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Audi A3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Audi A3 would be higher. At 1,759 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Daewoo Rezzo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Audi A3 (100 HP) has 3 more horse power than 2001 Daewoo Rezzo. (97 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Audi A3 should accelerate faster than 2001 Daewoo Rezzo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Daewoo Rezzo weights approximately 136 kg more than 1996 Audi A3.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Daewoo Rezzo (148 Nm) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Audi A3. (136 Nm). This means 2001 Daewoo Rezzo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Audi A3.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Audi A3 | 2001 Daewoo Rezzo | |
Make | Audi | Daewoo |
Model | A3 | Rezzo |
Year Released | 1996 | 2001 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1595 cc | 1759 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 97 HP |
Torque | 136 Nm | 148 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 80.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 77.5 mm | 86.5 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1134 kg | 1270 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 4360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1590 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2610 mm |