1996 Audi A3 vs. 2001 Mazda 626
To start off, 2001 Mazda 626 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Audi A3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Audi A3 would be higher. At 1,840 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Mazda 626 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 100 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Mazda 626 weights approximately 106 kg more than 1996 Audi A3.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Mazda 626 (149 Nm) has 13 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Audi A3. (136 Nm). This means 2001 Mazda 626 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Audi A3.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Audi A3 | 2001 Mazda 626 | |
Make | Audi | Mazda |
Model | A3 | 626 |
Year Released | 1996 | 2001 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1595 cc | 1840 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 100 HP |
Torque | 136 Nm | 149 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 77.5 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.3:1 | 8.6:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1134 kg | 1240 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 4680 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2680 mm |