1996 Audi A3 vs. 2002 Toyota ES 3
To start off, 2002 Toyota ES 3 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Audi A3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Audi A3 would be higher. At 1,781 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Audi A3 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Audi A3 weights approximately 750 kg more than 2002 Toyota ES 3.
Because 1996 Audi A3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Toyota ES 3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Audi A3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Audi A3 | 2002 Toyota ES 3 | |
Make | Audi | Toyota |
Model | A3 | ES 3 |
Year Released | 1996 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1781 cc | 1364 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1450 kg | 700 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 3530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2320 mm |