1996 Audi A3 vs. 2006 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2006 Cadillac CTS is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Audi A3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Audi A3 would be higher. At 2,597 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 344 kg more than 1996 Audi A3.
Because 1996 Audi A3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Cadillac CTS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Audi A3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Audi A3 | 2006 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Audi | Cadillac |
Model | A3 | CTS |
Year Released | 1996 | 2006 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1781 cc | 2597 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 179 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 83.2 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 79.6 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 10.0:1 |
Top Speed | 226 km/hour | 223 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 7.5 seconds | 9.3 seconds |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1450 kg | 1794 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 4830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2890 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 68 L |