1996 Audi A3 vs. 2008 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2008 Holden Commodore is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Audi A3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Audi A3 would be higher. At 2,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Holden Commodore (240 HP) has 140 more horse power than 1996 Audi A3. (100 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 1996 Audi A3.
Because 2008 Holden Commodore is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 Holden Commodore. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Audi A3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Holden Commodore (240 Nm) has 104 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Audi A3. (136 Nm). This means 2008 Holden Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Audi A3.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Audi A3 | 2008 Holden Commodore | |
| Make | Audi | Holden |
| Model | A3 | Commodore |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2008 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1595 cc | 2564 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 240 HP |
| Torque | 136 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
