1996 Audi A3 vs. 2008 Suzuki Reno
To start off, 2008 Suzuki Reno is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Audi A3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Audi A3 would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Suzuki Reno is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Suzuki Reno (128 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 1996 Audi A3. (101 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Suzuki Reno should accelerate faster than 1996 Audi A3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Audi A3 weights approximately 81 kg more than 2008 Suzuki Reno.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Suzuki Reno (178 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Audi A3. (144 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 2008 Suzuki Reno will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Audi A3.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Audi A3 | 2008 Suzuki Reno | |
Make | Audi | Suzuki |
Model | A3 | Reno |
Year Released | 1996 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1595 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 101 HP | 128 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 144 Nm | 178 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.3:1 | 9.6:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1146 kg | 1065 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 4300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 55 L |