1996 Audi A3 vs. 2009 Mazda 2
To start off, 2009 Mazda 2 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Audi A3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Audi A3 would be higher. At 1,595 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Audi A3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 2 (102 HP) has 2 more horse power than 1996 Audi A3. (100 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 2 should accelerate faster than 1996 Audi A3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Audi A3 weights approximately 174 kg more than 2009 Mazda 2.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda 2 (137 Nm) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Audi A3. (136 Nm). This means 2009 Mazda 2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Audi A3.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Audi A3 | 2009 Mazda 2 | |
Make | Audi | Mazda |
Model | A3 | 2 |
Year Released | 1996 | 2009 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1595 cc | 1498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 102 HP |
Torque | 136 Nm | 137 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 78 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 77.5 mm | 78.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.3:1 | 10.0:1 |
Top Speed | 190 km/hour | 188 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1134 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 3890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2500 mm |