1996 Audi A3 vs. 2009 Mazda BT-50
To start off, 2009 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Audi A3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Audi A3 would be higher. At 2,953 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda BT-50 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda BT-50 (154 HP @ 3200 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 1996 Audi A3. (151 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda BT-50 should accelerate faster than 1996 Audi A3.
Because 2009 Mazda BT-50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Audi A3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda BT-50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda BT-50 (380 Nm @ 180 RPM) has 170 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Audi A3. (210 Nm @ 1750 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda BT-50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Audi A3.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Audi A3 | 2009 Mazda BT-50 | |
Make | Audi | Mazda |
Model | A3 | BT-50 |
Year Released | 1996 | 2009 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1781 cc | 2953 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 151 HP | 154 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Torque | 210 Nm | 380 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 180 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 96.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 102 mm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 3010 mm |