1996 Audi A3 vs. 2011 Fisker Karma
To start off, 2011 Fisker Karma is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Audi A3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Audi A3 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Fisker Karma weights approximately 1400 kg more than 1996 Audi A3.
Because 2011 Fisker Karma is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2011 Fisker Karma. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Audi A3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Audi A3 | 2011 Fisker Karma | |
| Make | Audi | Fisker |
| Model | A3 | Karma |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Single Speed |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1140 kg | 2540 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 4996 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1984 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1331 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 3160 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 36 L |
