1996 Audi A3 vs. 2011 Mazda BT-50
To start off, 2011 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Audi A3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Audi A3 would be higher. At 2,604 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Mazda BT-50 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Mazda BT-50 (123 HP) has 23 more horse power than 1996 Audi A3. (100 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Mazda BT-50 should accelerate faster than 1996 Audi A3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Audi A3 weights approximately 9 kg more than 2011 Mazda BT-50.
Because 2011 Mazda BT-50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Audi A3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Mazda BT-50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Mazda BT-50 (206 Nm) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Audi A3. (136 Nm). This means 2011 Mazda BT-50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Audi A3.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Audi A3 | 2011 Mazda BT-50 | |
Make | Audi | Mazda |
Model | A3 | BT-50 |
Year Released | 1996 | 2011 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1595 cc | 2604 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 123 HP |
Torque | 136 Nm | 206 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 77.5 mm | 98 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.3:1 | 8.4:1 |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1134 kg | 1125 kg |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 3010 mm |