1996 Audi A4 vs. 1960 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1996 Audi A4 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1996 Audi A4. (193 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1960 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1996 Audi A4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 625 kg more than 1996 Audi A4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1996 Audi A4 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Audi A4 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Audi A4 | 1960 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | Audi | Cadillac |
| Model | A4 | 62 |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1960 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2771 cc | 6390 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 193 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1570 kg | 2195 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 5730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 2040 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 3310 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 75 L |
