1996 Audi A4 vs. 1982 Daihatsu Taft
To start off, 1996 Audi A4 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Daihatsu Taft. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Daihatsu Taft would be higher. At 2,771 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Audi A4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Audi A4 (193 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 125 more horse power than 1982 Daihatsu Taft. (68 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Audi A4 should accelerate faster than 1982 Daihatsu Taft. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Audi A4 weights approximately 240 kg more than 1982 Daihatsu Taft. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Audi A4 (280 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 115 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Daihatsu Taft. (165 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 1996 Audi A4 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Daihatsu Taft.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Audi A4 | 1982 Daihatsu Taft | |
Make | Audi | Daihatsu |
Model | A4 | Taft |
Year Released | 1996 | 1982 |
Engine Size | 2771 cc | 2764 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 193 HP | 68 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 280 Nm | 165 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 2200 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1570 kg | 1330 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 3370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1470 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2030 mm |