1996 Audi A4 vs. 2000 Chevrolet Tracker

To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Audi A4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Audi A4 would be higher. At 1,781 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Audi A4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Audi A4 (123 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 2000 Chevrolet Tracker. (97 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Audi A4 should accelerate faster than 2000 Chevrolet Tracker.

Because 2000 Chevrolet Tracker is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Chevrolet Tracker. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Audi A4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Audi A4 (173 Nm @ 3950 RPM) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Chevrolet Tracker. (139 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1996 Audi A4 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Chevrolet Tracker.

Compare all specifications:

1996 Audi A4 2000 Chevrolet Tracker
Make Audi Chevrolet
Model A4 Tracker
Year Released 1996 2000
Body Type Station Wagon SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1781 cc 1590 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 5 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 123 HP 97 HP
Engine RPM 5800 RPM 5200 RPM
Torque 173 Nm 139 Nm
Torque RPM 3950 RPM 4000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Length 4480 mm 4140 mm
Vehicle Width 1740 mm 1720 mm
Vehicle Height 1420 mm 1690 mm
Wheelbase Size 2630 mm 2210 mm