1996 Audi A6 vs. 1955 Rolls-Royce Phantom
To start off, 1996 Audi A6 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Rolls-Royce Phantom. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Rolls-Royce Phantom would be higher.
Because 1955 Rolls-Royce Phantom is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Rolls-Royce Phantom. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Audi A6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Audi A6 | 1955 Rolls-Royce Phantom | |
| Make | Audi | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | A6 | Phantom |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1955 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 191 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1960 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 3690 mm |
