1996 Audi A6 vs. 1965 Ford Zodiac
To start off, 1996 Audi A6 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Ford Zodiac. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Ford Zodiac would be higher. At 2,771 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Audi A6 (190 HP) has 82 more horse power than 1965 Ford Zodiac. (108 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 1965 Ford Zodiac.
Because 1996 Audi A6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Ford Zodiac. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Audi A6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Audi A6 (286 Nm) has 96 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Ford Zodiac. (190 Nm). This means 1996 Audi A6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Ford Zodiac.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Audi A6 | 1965 Ford Zodiac | |
| Make | Audi | Ford |
| Model | A6 | Zodiac |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2771 cc | 2553 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 190 HP | 108 HP |
| Torque | 286 Nm | 190 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 82.6 mm | 82.6 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 79.5 mm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4650 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2780 mm |
