1996 Audi A6 vs. 1966 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 1996 Audi A6 is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 2,391 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Audi A6 (165 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 51 more horse power than 1966 Nissan Cedric. (114 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 1966 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Audi A6 weights approximately 205 kg more than 1966 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1996 Audi A6 (230 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 65 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Nissan Cedric. (165 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1996 Audi A6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Audi A6 | 1966 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | Audi | Nissan |
Model | A6 | Cedric |
Year Released | 1996 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2391 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 165 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 230 Nm | 165 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Vehicle Weight | 1495 kg | 1290 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2700 mm |