1996 Audi A6 vs. 1975 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 1996 Audi A6 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 4,093 cc (6 cylinders), 1975 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Audi A6 (149 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 1975 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (104 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 1975 Oldsmobile Cutlass. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1975 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 295 kg more than 1996 Audi A6.
Because 1996 Audi A6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1975 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Audi A6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1975 Oldsmobile Cutlass (251 Nm @ 1200 RPM) has 41 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Audi A6. (210 Nm @ 1750 RPM). This means 1975 Oldsmobile Cutlass will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Audi A6.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Audi A6 | 1975 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Audi | Oldsmobile |
Model | A6 | Cutlass |
Year Released | 1996 | 1975 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1781 cc | 4093 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 149 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 210 Nm | 251 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 1200 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1450 kg | 1745 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 5270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1960 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2850 mm |