1996 Audi A6 vs. 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma
To start off, 1996 Audi A6 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma would be higher. At 2,771 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Audi A6 (190 HP) has 101 more horse power than 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma. (89 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma.
Because 1996 Audi A6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Audi A6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Audi A6 (286 Nm) has 168 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma. (118 Nm). This means 1996 Audi A6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma. 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma has automatic transmission and 1996 Audi A6 has manual transmission. 1996 Audi A6 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Audi A6 | 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma | |
Make | Audi | Mitsubishi |
Model | A6 | Sigma |
Year Released | 1996 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2771 cc | 1597 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 89 HP |
Torque | 286 Nm | 118 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2520 mm |