1996 Audi A6 vs. 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv
To start off, 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Audi A6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Audi A6 would be higher. At 2,771 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv (276 HP @ 9000 RPM) has 85 more horse power than 1996 Audi A6. (191 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv should accelerate faster than 1996 Audi A6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Audi A6 weights approximately 325 kg more than 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv.
Because 1996 Audi A6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Audi A6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Audi A6 (280 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 66 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv. (214 Nm @ 8000 RPM). This means 1996 Audi A6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Audi A6 | 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv | |
| Make | Audi | Mazda |
| Model | A6 | RX-Evolv |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2771 cc | 2616 cc |
| Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 191 HP | 276 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 9000 RPM |
| Torque | 280 Nm | 214 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 8000 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1575 kg | 1250 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4290 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1360 mm |
