1996 Audi A6 vs. 2000 Pagani Zonda
To start off, 2000 Pagani Zonda is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Audi A6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Audi A6 would be higher. At 5,987 cc (12 cylinders), 2000 Pagani Zonda is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Pagani Zonda (389 HP) has 199 more horse power than 1996 Audi A6. (190 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Pagani Zonda should accelerate faster than 1996 Audi A6.
Because 1996 Audi A6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Pagani Zonda. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Audi A6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Pagani Zonda (569 Nm) has 283 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Audi A6. (286 Nm). This means 2000 Pagani Zonda will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Audi A6.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Audi A6 | 2000 Pagani Zonda | |
Make | Audi | Pagani |
Model | A6 | Zonda |
Year Released | 1996 | 2000 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2771 cc | 5987 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 389 HP |
Torque | 286 Nm | 569 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4395 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 2055 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1151 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2730 mm |