1996 Audi A6 vs. 2003 Avanti Studebaker

To start off, 2003 Avanti Studebaker is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Audi A6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Audi A6 would be higher. At 5,952 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Avanti Studebaker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Avanti Studebaker (321 HP @ 3300 RPM) has 130 more horse power than 1996 Audi A6. (191 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Avanti Studebaker should accelerate faster than 1996 Audi A6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Avanti Studebaker weights approximately 1160 kg more than 1996 Audi A6. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Avanti Studebaker (560 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 280 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Audi A6. (280 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2003 Avanti Studebaker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Audi A6. 2003 Avanti Studebaker has automatic transmission and 1996 Audi A6 has manual transmission. 1996 Audi A6 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Avanti Studebaker will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: