1996 Audi A6 vs. 2004 Marcos TS
To start off, 2004 Marcos TS is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Audi A6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Audi A6 would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Marcos TS is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Audi A6 weights approximately 145 kg more than 2004 Marcos TS.
Because 2004 Marcos TS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Marcos TS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Audi A6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Audi A6 | 2004 Marcos TS | |
Make | Audi | Marcos |
Model | A6 | TS |
Year Released | 1996 | 2004 |
Engine Size | 1781 cc | 5000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1420 kg | 1275 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4010 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1160 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2230 mm |