1996 Audi A6 vs. 2004 Mazda 6

To start off, 2004 Mazda 6 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Audi A6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Audi A6 would be higher. At 2,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda 6 (220 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 71 more horse power than 1996 Audi A6. (149 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1996 Audi A6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda 6 weights approximately 87 kg more than 1996 Audi A6. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1996 Audi A6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Mazda 6. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Audi A6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mazda 6 (257 Nm) has 47 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Audi A6. (210 Nm). This means 2004 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Audi A6.

Compare all specifications:

1996 Audi A6 2004 Mazda 6
Make Audi Mazda
Model A6 6
Year Released 1996 2004
Body Type Sedan Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1781 cc 2966 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 149 HP 220 HP
Engine RPM 5700 RPM 4000 RPM
Torque 210 Nm 257 Nm
Engine Bore Size 81 mm 89 mm
Engine Stroke Size 86.4 mm 80 mm
Drive Type 4WD Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1450 kg 1537 kg
Vehicle Length 4800 mm 4780 mm
Vehicle Width 1820 mm 1790 mm
Vehicle Height 1460 mm 1460 mm
Wheelbase Size 2770 mm 2680 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 70 L 68 L