1996 Audi A6 vs. 2004 MCC Crossblade
To start off, 2004 MCC Crossblade is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Audi A6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Audi A6 would be higher. At 2,771 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Audi A6 (190 HP) has 120 more horse power than 2004 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 2004 MCC Crossblade.
Because 1996 Audi A6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 MCC Crossblade. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Audi A6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Audi A6 (286 Nm) has 184 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm). This means 1996 Audi A6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 MCC Crossblade.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Audi A6 | 2004 MCC Crossblade | |
| Make | Audi | MCC |
| Model | A6 | Crossblade |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2004 |
| Engine Size | 2771 cc | 599 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 190 HP | 70 HP |
| Torque | 286 Nm | 102 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 2630 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 1810 mm |
