1996 Audi A6 vs. 2008 SsangYong Musso
To start off, 2008 SsangYong Musso is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Audi A6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Audi A6 would be higher. At 2,874 cc (5 cylinders), 2008 SsangYong Musso is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 SsangYong Musso weights approximately 390 kg more than 1996 Audi A6.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 SsangYong Musso (305 Nm @ 2250 RPM) has 25 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Audi A6. (280 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2008 SsangYong Musso will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Audi A6.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Audi A6 | 2008 SsangYong Musso | |
Make | Audi | SsangYong |
Model | A6 | Musso |
Year Released | 1996 | 2008 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2771 cc | 2874 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 191 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 280 Nm | 305 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 2250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82.5 mm | 89.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.6:1 | 22.0:1 |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 7.9 seconds | 18.3 seconds |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1515 kg | 1905 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4340 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1850 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2640 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 80 L |