1996 Audi A6 vs. 2009 Chevrolet Epica
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Epica is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Audi A6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Audi A6 would be higher. At 2,771 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Audi A6 (190 HP) has 42 more horse power than 2009 Chevrolet Epica. (148 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 2009 Chevrolet Epica.
Because 1996 Audi A6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Chevrolet Epica. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Audi A6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chevrolet Epica (320 Nm) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Audi A6. (286 Nm). This means 2009 Chevrolet Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Audi A6.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Audi A6 | 2009 Chevrolet Epica | |
| Make | Audi | Chevrolet |
| Model | A6 | Epica |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2771 cc | 1991 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 190 HP | 148 HP |
| Torque | 286 Nm | 320 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 82.6 mm | 83 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 92 mm |
| Top Speed | 235 km/hour | 200 km/hour |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4810 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2710 mm |
