1996 Audi A6 vs. 2009 Nissan Cube
To start off, 2009 Nissan Cube is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Audi A6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Audi A6 would be higher. At 2,392 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Audi A6 (162 HP) has 42 more horse power than 2009 Nissan Cube. (120 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 2009 Nissan Cube.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Audi A6 (230 Nm) has 103 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Nissan Cube. (127 Nm). This means 1996 Audi A6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Nissan Cube. 2009 Nissan Cube has automatic transmission and 1996 Audi A6 has manual transmission. 1996 Audi A6 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Nissan Cube will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Audi A6 | 2009 Nissan Cube | |
Make | Audi | Nissan |
Model | A6 | Cube |
Year Released | 1996 | 2009 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2392 cc | 1798 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 162 HP | 120 HP |
Torque | 230 Nm | 127 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1620 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2640 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 82 L |