1996 Audi A6 vs. 2010 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2010 Toyota Matrix is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Audi A6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Audi A6 would be higher. At 2,771 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Audi A6 (190 HP) has 32 more horse power than 2010 Toyota Matrix. (158 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 2010 Toyota Matrix.
Because 1996 Audi A6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Toyota Matrix. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Audi A6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Audi A6 (286 Nm) has 67 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Toyota Matrix. (219 Nm). This means 1996 Audi A6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Toyota Matrix.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Audi A6 | 2010 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Audi | Toyota |
Model | A6 | Matrix |
Year Released | 1996 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2771 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 158 HP |
Torque | 286 Nm | 219 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4394 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1765 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2601 mm |