1996 Audi A6 vs. 2013 Suzuki Kizashi
To start off, 2013 Suzuki Kizashi is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Audi A6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Audi A6 would be higher.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Audi A6 | 2013 Suzuki Kizashi | |
Make | Audi | Suzuki |
Model | A6 | Kizashi |
Year Released | 1996 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 149 HP | 0 HP |
Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | manual |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |