1996 Audi A8 vs. 2012 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2012 Toyota Matrix is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Audi A8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Audi A8 would be higher. At 2,771 cc, 1996 Audi A8 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Audi A8 | 2012 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Audi | Toyota |
Model | A8 | Matrix |
Year Released | 1996 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2771 cc | 1800 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 132 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5040 mm | 4366 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1765 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1549 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2601 mm |