1996 Audi RS2 vs. 1951 Buick 40
To start off, 1996 Audi RS2 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,066 cc (8 cylinders), 1951 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Audi RS2 (311 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 192 more horse power than 1951 Buick 40. (119 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Audi RS2 should accelerate faster than 1951 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Buick 40 weights approximately 40 kg more than 1996 Audi RS2.
Because 1996 Audi RS2 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1951 Buick 40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Audi RS2 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Audi RS2 (410 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 118 more torque (in Nm) than 1951 Buick 40. (292 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1996 Audi RS2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1951 Buick 40.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Audi RS2 | 1951 Buick 40 | |
Make | Audi | Buick |
Model | RS2 | 40 |
Year Released | 1996 | 1951 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2226 cc | 4066 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 311 HP | 119 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 410 Nm | 292 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1595 kg | 1635 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1950 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 3090 mm |