1996 Audi RS2 vs. 1970 Zastava 1300

To start off, 1996 Audi RS2 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Zastava 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Zastava 1300 would be higher. At 2,226 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Audi RS2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Audi RS2 (311 HP) has 258 more horse power than 1970 Zastava 1300. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Audi RS2 should accelerate faster than 1970 Zastava 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Audi RS2 weights approximately 615 kg more than 1970 Zastava 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1996 Audi RS2 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1970 Zastava 1300. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Audi RS2 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Audi RS2 (410 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 317 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Zastava 1300. (93 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1996 Audi RS2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Zastava 1300.

Compare all specifications:

1996 Audi RS2 1970 Zastava 1300
Make Audi Zastava
Model RS2 1300
Year Released 1996 1970
Engine Size 2226 cc 1295 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 311 HP 53 HP
Torque 410 Nm 93 Nm
Torque RPM 3000 RPM 3200 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type 4WD Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Weight 1595 kg 980 kg
Vehicle Length 4520 mm 4040 mm
Vehicle Width 1700 mm 1550 mm
Vehicle Height 1390 mm 1450 mm
Wheelbase Size 2600 mm 2430 mm