1996 Audi RS2 vs. 1979 BMW 320
To start off, 1996 Audi RS2 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 BMW 320. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 BMW 320 would be higher. At 2,226 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Audi RS2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1979 BMW 320 (641 HP @ 9000 RPM) has 330 more horse power than 1996 Audi RS2. (311 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1979 BMW 320 should accelerate faster than 1996 Audi RS2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Audi RS2 weights approximately 755 kg more than 1979 BMW 320.
Because 1996 Audi RS2 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1979 BMW 320. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Audi RS2 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Audi RS2 | 1979 BMW 320 | |
Make | Audi | BMW |
Model | RS2 | 320 |
Year Released | 1996 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2226 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 311 HP | 641 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 9000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1595 kg | 840 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2570 mm |