1996 Audi RS2 vs. 1980 Cadillac DeVille
To start off, 1996 Audi RS2 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,030 cc (8 cylinders), 1980 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 315 kg more than 1996 Audi RS2.
Because 1996 Audi RS2 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Cadillac DeVille. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Audi RS2 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1980 Cadillac DeVille has automatic transmission and 1996 Audi RS2 has manual transmission. 1996 Audi RS2 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1980 Cadillac DeVille will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Audi RS2 | 1980 Cadillac DeVille | |
| Make | Audi | Cadillac |
| Model | RS2 | DeVille |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2226 cc | 6030 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 311 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1595 kg | 1910 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 5620 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1950 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 3090 mm |
