1996 Audi RS2 vs. 1982 Austin Allegro
To start off, 1996 Audi RS2 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Austin Allegro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Austin Allegro would be higher. At 2,226 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Audi RS2 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Audi RS2 weights approximately 745 kg more than 1982 Austin Allegro.
Because 1996 Audi RS2 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Austin Allegro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Audi RS2 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Audi RS2 | 1982 Austin Allegro | |
Make | Audi | Austin |
Model | RS2 | Allegro |
Year Released | 1996 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2226 cc | 1275 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 311 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1595 kg | 850 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2450 mm |