1996 Audi RS2 vs. 1985 Mercury Cougar
To start off, 1996 Audi RS2 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1985 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Audi RS2 weights approximately 115 kg more than 1985 Mercury Cougar.
Because 1996 Audi RS2 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1985 Mercury Cougar. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Audi RS2 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Audi RS2 | 1985 Mercury Cougar | |
Make | Audi | Mercury |
Model | RS2 | Cougar |
Year Released | 1996 | 1985 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2226 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 311 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1595 kg | 1480 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 5140 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2650 mm |