1996 Audi RS2 vs. 1987 Mitsubishi HSR-V
To start off, 1996 Audi RS2 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Mitsubishi HSR-V. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Mitsubishi HSR-V would be higher.
Because 1996 Audi RS2 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1987 Mitsubishi HSR-V. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Audi RS2 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1987 Mitsubishi HSR-V has automatic transmission and 1996 Audi RS2 has manual transmission. 1996 Audi RS2 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1987 Mitsubishi HSR-V will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Audi RS2 | 1987 Mitsubishi HSR-V | |
Make | Audi | Mitsubishi |
Model | RS2 | HSR-V |
Year Released | 1996 | 1987 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Horse Power | 311 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |