1996 Audi RS2 vs. 1988 Chrysler Le Baron
To start off, 1996 Audi RS2 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Chrysler Le Baron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Chrysler Le Baron would be higher. At 2,226 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Audi RS2 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Audi RS2 weights approximately 395 kg more than 1988 Chrysler Le Baron.
Because 1996 Audi RS2 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1988 Chrysler Le Baron. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Audi RS2 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Audi RS2 | 1988 Chrysler Le Baron | |
Make | Audi | Chrysler |
Model | RS2 | Le Baron |
Year Released | 1996 | 1988 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2226 cc | 2212 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 311 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1595 kg | 1200 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2560 mm |