1996 Audi RS2 vs. 1998 Proton Satria
To start off, 1998 Proton Satria is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Audi RS2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Audi RS2 would be higher. At 2,226 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Audi RS2 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1996 Audi RS2 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1998 Proton Satria. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Audi RS2 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Audi RS2 (410 Nm) has 249 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Proton Satria. (161 Nm). This means 1996 Audi RS2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Proton Satria.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Audi RS2 | 1998 Proton Satria | |
Make | Audi | Proton |
Model | RS2 | Satria |
Year Released | 1996 | 1998 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2226 cc | 1833 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 311 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 410 Nm | 161 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2450 mm |