1996 Audi RS2 vs. 2001 Chevrolet Tracker
To start off, 2001 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Audi RS2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Audi RS2 would be higher. At 2,499 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Audi RS2 weights approximately 55 kg more than 2001 Chevrolet Tracker.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Audi RS2 (410 Nm) has 193 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Chevrolet Tracker. (217 Nm). This means 1996 Audi RS2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Chevrolet Tracker.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Audi RS2 | 2001 Chevrolet Tracker | |
Make | Audi | Chevrolet |
Model | RS2 | Tracker |
Year Released | 1996 | 2001 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2226 cc | 2499 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 311 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 410 Nm | 217 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1595 kg | 1540 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 3860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2210 mm |